Martinez-Marmol v. State

The Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis, holding that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a meritorious attack on the judgment because he failed to establish an error of fact extrinsic to the record that could not have been raised in the trial court.In his petition, Petitioner, who was convicted of three counts of rape, argued that he was mentally incompetent and that trial counsel was ineffective. The Supreme Court denied relief, holding that Petitioner failed to demonstrate that a writ should issue. View "Martinez-Marmol v. State" on Justia Law