Scott v. State

by
The Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s pro se motion filed pursuant to the state Freedom of Information Act, in which Petitioner sought a copy at public expense of certain written material on file with the Supreme Court. Specifically, Petitioner asked for copies of four coram nobis petitions that he filed in his criminal case but sought to be excused from paying the standard photocopying fee charged by the clerk’s office. In denying the petition, the Supreme Court held that Petitioner failed to show that copies of the coram nobis petitions should be provided to him at no cost. View "Scott v. State" on Justia Law