Grady v. State

The Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s request that that court reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis in his criminal case. Petitioner, who was found guilty of unlawful use of a communication device and delivery of a controlled substance, argued that the writ should issue in his case because the State suppressed exculpatory evidence at the time of his trial. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding that Petitioner failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that the judgment of conviction would not have been rendered, or would have been prevented, had the alleged exculpatory evidence been disclosed at trial. View "Grady v. State" on Justia Law